**Please Note: **
This article is written for users of the following Microsoft Excel versions: 97, 2000, 2002, and 2003. If you are using a later version (Excel 2007 or later), *this tip may not work for you*. For a version of this tip written specifically for later versions of Excel, click here: Counting Groupings Below a Threshold.

Ronald imports a number of signal-level measurements as a series of values into Excel. He needs to count how many consecutive groups of values exist in this series which fall below a certain threshold. For example, he may have the following measurements:

27, 22, 22, 30, 32, 18, 22, 23, 28, 39, 24, 27, 35, 25, 21

If he wants to know the number of groupings where the members of those groupings were under 26, the answer would be 4. Note that this is the groupings of consecutive values below 26, not the number of individual values below 26. Thus, in this case, the four groupings would be shown by the brackets in the following:

27, [22, 22], 30, 32, [18, 22, 23], 28, 39, [24], 27, 35, [25, 21]

Ronald is wondering what sort of formula he can use to figure out the number of groupings that fall below some arbitrary threshold he might specify.

There are actually several different ways you can approach this. The first is to use a "results column" that essentially notes changes in threshold and sequence grouping. For instance, if you had the above values in column A of a worksheet (starting at cell A2) and the threshold value in cell E1, then you could use the following formula in every cell to the right of a value in column A:

=IF(A2>=$E$1,B1,IF(A1<$E$1,B1,B1+1))

The formula keeps a running sum of the groups below the threshold. The max (or last value) of column B provides the total number of groups below the threshold. The formula checks to see whether the value immediately to the left, in column A, is above or below the threshold. If it's above, or if not and the previous value in column A was also below, then it doesn't increment the running sum. Otherwise, it does increment because a new grouping is starting.

A related way of doing the count is to use this formula in column B, instead:

=IF(A2>=$E$1,0,IF(A1<$E$1,0,1))

This results in column B containing a series of 0 or 1 values. The only time that a 1 value occurs is at the start of a series that is below the threshold. This makes it easy to sum all the values in column B, which provides the count of groupings.

If you don't want to use the results column, you can use an array formula to figure out the count. The following formula assumes, again, that the values to be analyzed are in column A, beginning at A2, and that the threshold value is in cell E1. Remember, as well, that array formulas are entered by pressing **Ctrl+Shift+Enter**.

=SUM(IF((A2:A16<$E$1)*((A2:A16<$E$1)*1<>((A1:A15<$E$1)*ISNUMBER(A1:A15))),1))

The formula basically does what the previous results-column formula did (determines a 0 or 1 based on whether a below-threshold grouping is starting) and then sums those values.

Of course, if you do these types of comparisons a lot, you may want to develop your own user-defined function (a macro) to figure the count of groupings for you. The following is an example of such a function.

Function CountGroups(ByVal MyRange As Range, Threshold As Single) Dim Cell As Range Dim bInGroup As Boolean Dim iCount As Integer Application.Volatile iCount = 0 bInGroup = False For Each Cell In MyRange If Application.IsNumber(Cell) Then If Cell < Threshold Then 'Less than the threshold? If Not bInGroup Then 'Only count if starting new group iCount = iCount + 1 bInGroup = True 'Mark as being in group End If Else bInGroup = False 'No longer in a group End If End If Next CountGroups = iCount End Function

The function looks through each cell in a range and calculates if it is the start of a new below-threshold group or not. You use the function by using a formula such as the following in your worksheet:

=CountGroups(A2:A16,E1)

*ExcelTips* is your source for cost-effective Microsoft Excel training.
This tip (3171) applies to Microsoft Excel 97, 2000, 2002, and 2003. You can find a version of this tip for the ribbon interface of Excel (Excel 2007 and later) here: **Counting Groupings Below a Threshold**.

**Solve Real Business Problems** Master business modeling and analysis techniques with Excel and transform data into bottom-line results. This hands-on, scenario-focused guide shows you how to use the latest Excel tools to integrate data from multiple tables. Check out *Microsoft Excel 2013 Data Analysis and Business Modeling* today!

If you have a range of values that can be either positive or negative, you might wonder how to determine the largest ...

Discover MoreDo you see some small rectangular boxes appearing in your formula results? It could be because Excel is substituting that box ...

Discover MoreAt the heart of working with Excel is the process of creating formulas that calculate results based on information within a ...

Discover More**FREE SERVICE:** Get tips like this every week in *ExcelTips,* a free productivity newsletter. Enter your address and click "Subscribe."

Got a version of Excel that uses the
menu interface (Excel 97, Excel 2000, Excel 2002, or Excel 2003)?
**This site is for you!** If you
use a later version of Excel, visit
our *ExcelTips* site focusing on the ribbon interface.

**FREE SERVICE:** Get tips like this every week in *ExcelTips,* a free productivity newsletter. Enter your address and click "Subscribe."

Copyright © 2017 Sharon Parq Associates, Inc.

2014-08-04 03:06:09

Jackie

Hi, i failed to get this one, all i needed was to know the values below a certain number eg 26 where i would get 8. i think if we have the values put in an excel spreadsheet it would help

thanks

2014-04-01 05:34:28

Michael (Micky) Avidan

@Tim,

Thanks for checking the "Extreme case" - however, it looks as if you (like me) prefer formulas to be as short as possible - then "+(A2<E1)" will do the same job.

By the way - when using a single(!) formula, all the obsulute references ($$$) become superfluous.

Michael (Micky) Avidan

“Microsoft® Answers" - Wiki author & Forums Moderator

“Microsoft®” MVP – Excel (2009-2014)

ISRAEL

2014-03-31 14:10:31

Tim Murphy

I took Micky formula and added an IF statement to the end. Not eloquent, but it works.

=SUM(N(($A$2:$A$16>=$E$1)+($A$1:$A$15<$E$1)=0))+IF($A$2<$E$1,1,0)

2014-03-31 14:05:35

Tim Murphy

If 28 is the test, it should be four groups.

[27, 22, 22], 30, 32, [18, 22, 23], 28, 39, [24, 27], 35, [25, 21]

If the first value is part of the group the suggested formulas don't work. They return 3 for an answer, except this suggestion (array formula).

=SUM(IF((A2:A16<$E$1)*((A2:A16<$E$1)*1<>((A1:A15<$E$1)*ISNUMBER(A1:A15))),1))

2014-03-29 13:28:52

Michael (Micky) Avidan

To begin with, if you want to use the helper-column "B" - the formula can be a lot simplier.

Starting in "B2" type: =IF(OR(A2>=E$1,A1<E$1),,1) and copy down.

The more proffessional/appropriate way to count the groups into ONE SINGLE cell (without any helper cells) is the Array Formula:

=SUM(N((A2:A16>=E$1)+(A1:A15<E$1)=0))

Michael (Micky) Avidan

“Microsoft® Answers" - Wiki author & Forums Moderator

“Microsoft®” MVP – Excel (2009-2014)

ISRAEL